Review: Hoka One One Cavu || Light, responsive & fast road trainer

The new Hoka Cavu will be released in February 2018. It’s a lightweight trainer with a responsive forefoot, best for fast road efforts and perhaps racing.

The Houston Marathon is less than six weeks, and for all of my tempo workouts and hard long runs — including multiple 10K’s at race pace and distances up to 24 miles — I have been wearing the new Hoka One One Cavu. The Cavu is a neutral lightweight road trainer that is moderately cushioned, responsive, and fast. It will best fit feet with average width and volume.

The Cavu is more durable and cushioned than a racing flat like the ASICS GEL-Hyper Speed 7 (my review), but more nimble than a standard road shoe like the Hoka One One Clifton 4 (my review). For Hoka’s trio of sub-2:14 marathoners, the Cavu may be a delightful daily trainer. For veteran but non-elite runners like me, it’s best for workouts or marathon+ races. And for others, it could be racing-worthy.

Want a pair? Unfortunately, you’ll have to wait until February 2018. I was able to obtain a production-quality sample in my size from Hoka for review. It will be released around the same time as the new Mach, which is the next generation Clayton 2.

Key product specs

  • Weight: 8.2 oz (men’s size 9), 6.6 oz (women’s size 7); 9.0 oz for men’s size 11.5 (verified)
  • Stack height: 24/20 mm (men’s), 22/18 mm (women’s) for heel/forefoot
  • Drop: 4 mm
  • Engineered mesh upper
  • ProFly midsole: firm forefoot, softer heel
  • RMAT outsole (blended rubber & foam) with exposed midsole foam
  • $110 MSRP
  • Release date: February 2018
  • More info

Fit

Average-width feet will best fit the Cavu. However, wider feet may find that the soft and unstructured upper is acceptably forgiving, and narrower feet (like mine) may feel secure enough with a simple tightening of the laces.

The Cavu shares the same last as the Clifton 4 and new Challenger ATR 4, but it fits and feels differently than both. To me, the axis of the Clifton 4 feels off by a few degrees, with my big toe and arch skewed towards the inside edge of the shoe. In the Cavu, I feel more centered, as I do in the Challenger ATR 4 as well. However, the Challenger has a vastly different outsole (4 mm lugs), midsole (softer), and upper (reinforced toe bumper and forefoot overlays).

Versus the Clifton 2 and Speedgoat 2, the Cavu is wider throughout, particularly in the toebox.

The Cavu shares the same last and similar sock inserts as the new Challenger ATR 4 (red) and Clifton 4 (right). It fits most similar to the Challenger, but doesn’t feel similar to either.

Sizing

I am size 11.5 in other Hoka models (Clifton 2, Clifton 4, Speedgoat 2, Challenger 4) and with other brands, including Altra, Merrell, Salomon, and Salewa, and 45.5 in La Sportiva. The Cavu fits true to size, based on my experience.

Ride & midsole

The Cavu is a neutral trainer with only 4 mm of drop from the heel to toe; it has no deliberate stabilizing or supportive features. As a runner with generally efficient biomechanics, I prefer it this way.

The Cavu’s ProFLY midsole is soft in the heel, for a forgiving landing, and firmer in the forefoot, for a more responsive push-off. The transition between soft and firm foams is continuous, not abrupt — the two midsole foams transition over a zone, without a concrete line or seam.

The Cavu has a two-foam midsole: a soft and forgiving heel and a firm and responsive forefoot.

The heel cushioning feels on par with the Clifton 4 or Challenger ATR 4, but it’s not “marshmallowy” like the Clifton 2 or Speedgoat 2. The forefoot is stiffer than any Hoka shoe I have worn. However, it’s still pliable, not slappy; and with 20 mm of foam and soft foam/rubber outsole under the forefoot, it does not feel “thin” like other fast trainers, such as the Salomon Sonic Pro 2 (my review), which is only 16 mm at the toe and which uses a harder outsole compound.

As a neutral shoe with a responsive forefoot and 8.2-oz weight (in men’s size 9), the Cavu feels suitable for and natural at high speeds. For context, my Houston goal is sub-2:30, and my harder efforts are in the low-5:00 minute/mile range. The only faster shoe in my closet is the aforementioned Asics flat; the Odyssey Pro 2 is on par, but the Cavu has a smoother heel-to-toe transition and better cushioning.

The stack height (for men’s) is 24 mm at the heel, 20 mm at the toe, giving a 4 mm drop. For women, it’s 22/18.

Outsole

In high-friction areas on the outsole (e.g. forefoot and heel), the Cavu features a thick layer of proprietary R-MAT, which is a blend of midsole foam and rubber. It’s lighter and more cushioned than pure rubber, but more wear-resistant than pure foam.

In low-friction regions like the arch, midsole foam is directly exposed. My initial skepticism about using abrasion-prone foam as an outsole material proved unfounded by other Hoka models, so long as the foam is not in high-stress spots.

On asphalt roads, concrete multi-use paths, and paint stripes, I have found the Cavu’s outsole grip to be more than adequate. On pea gravel bike trails and sandy road shoulders, there is some slipping; it’s decidedly not a trail shoe.

R-MAT is not as durable as a conventional outsole rubber, but this shortcoming is partially offset by its thickness on the Cavu. After 135 miles of use, the outsole appears to have at least two-thirds of its life remaining, probably more.

The Cavu outsole has a thick R-MAT layer in high-stress areas, and midsole foam everywhere else. The wear in this photo is after 65 miles of roads.

Upper

The Cavu has a secure heel counter, but otherwise the upper is slipper-like: a seamless, stretchy bootie covered by a soft and slightly stretchy engineered knit mesh, with no reinforcing overlays and a minimal toe bumper. The upper is very comfortable, with no pinching or pressure points.

Lateral and fore-and-aft control is supplied mostly by the elasticized bootie. If you have narrower and smaller-volume feet like mine, you might wish for a more snug fit, but it’s a shortcoming I can accept — unlike while trail running, I rarely encounter tight turns or steep descents while training or racing on the roads.

Highly breathable, soft, and slightly stretchy engineered knit mesh

Fabric breathability is excellent, and it should dry and expunge water quickly (though I can’t yet verify this first-hand).

The upper is double-layered. Underneath the knit mesh exterior, there is a stretchy bootie.

Aesthetics

By Hoka standards, the Cavu has wickedly understated looks. Its lines are clean and natural, and its colors will not offend (although the predominant blue is a shade too close to Carolina blue, in the opinion of a former Duke runner). I welcome this design change — I’m not a flashy person or flashy runner, and previous Hoka color schemes have given me a reason not to buy an otherwise worthy shoe.

Questions about the Hoka One One Cavu? Leave a comment.


Disclosure. This website is supported mostly through affiliate marketing, whereby for referral traffic I receive a small commission from select vendors, at no cost to the reader. This post contains affiliate links. Thanks for your support.

The post Review: Hoka One One Cavu || Light, responsive & fast road trainer appeared first on Andrew Skurka.

Add Comment